Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 08:22

Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
5 foods to add to your diet to prevent magnesium deficiency - Times of India
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why does my mother care about my sister more than me?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
John Harbaugh on Aaron Rodgers: I don’t have a reaction, just respect - NBC Sports
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
401(k) millionaires fell in the first quarter — but it’s not all bad news - MarketWatch
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Why is Meghan Markle's Hollywood presence fading despite her royal status and Netflix deal?